Conscientious objection: Support conscientious objection in Israel
In: Peace news for nonviolent revolution: PN, Heft 2450, S. 10-11
ISSN: 0031-3548
796 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Peace news for nonviolent revolution: PN, Heft 2450, S. 10-11
ISSN: 0031-3548
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 95-99
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 91-94
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 125-127
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 87-89
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 121-124
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 107-118
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 101-105
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: Cambridge elements. Elements in bioethics and neuroethics
The Element examines ethical and conceptual issues about conscientious objection in medicine. Concepts analyzed include conscientious objection, conscientious provision, conscience, moral complicity, and moral integrity. Several ongoing ethical controversies are identified and critically analyzed. One is a disagreement about whether conscientious objection is compatible with physicians' professional obligations. The Element argues that incompatibilists fail to offer a justifiable specification of professional obligations that supports their position. The Element also argues that a challenge for compatibilists who support a reason-giving requirement is to specify justifiable and unambiguous criteria for reviewing objectors' reasons. Arguments for and against requirements to inform and refer patients are critically analyzed, and an alternative, context-dependent requirement is offered. Another subject of controversy is about the justifiability of asymmetry between responses to conscientious objectors and conscientious providers. Typically, only the former receive accommodation. The Element critically examines arguments for asymmetry and maintains that none provides a convincing justi
In: Occasional Paper, No. 8
Second edition of the revised version of a reader on conscientious objection, which has been prompted by the Defence Amendment Act of 1983 and an increasing number of South African conscripts who question the validity of national military service, either as an universal principle or in the context of South Africa in the 1980s. (DÜI-Eng)
World Affairs Online
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 81, Heft 2, S. 201
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Peace review: peace, security & global change, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 207-209
ISSN: 1469-9982
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 29, Heft 1-2, S. 27-29
ISSN: 2732-5520
In: Peace review: the international quarterly of world peace, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 207-210
ISSN: 1040-2659